Close

Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PREVAILING PARTY RECOVERY OF LEGAL FEES IN BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS

Courts in Florida and most other jurisdictions award attorney’s fees to prevailing parties based on the American Rule. MV Senior Mgmt., LLC v. Redus Florida Hous., LLC, 319 So. 3d 66, 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (“Florida courts follow the ‘American rule.’”). This rule limits fee awards to instances where…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: CONTRACTS AND TRIGGERING ARBITRATION

“Arbitration is a preferred method of dispute resolution.” Obolensky v. Chatsworth as Wellington Green, 240 So. 3d 6 (quoting BallenIsles Country Club, Inc. v. Dexter Realty, 24 So. 3d 649, 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)). Therefore, “[c]ourts generally favor [arbitration] provisions, and [ ] try to resolve ambiguity… in favor…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS AND NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS

For certain business, their trade secrets and are their most valuable assets.  Accordingly, businesses will often seek to protect their trade secrets in various ways, including the use of a non-disclosure agreement (commonly referred to as an “NDA”).  An NDA is a contract that typically binds current and former employees…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: CUSTOMER LISTS AND TRADE SECRETS

Some businesses have experienced loss of customer relationships due to former employees taking customer relationships to competitors.  The most obvious way to protect against such a situation is to ensure employees sign a restrictive covenant under Florida Statutes Section 542.335, commonly referred to as a non-compete agreement, prohibiting solicitation of…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: OFFERS OF JUDGMENT AND SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE CASES

Under Florida’s offer of judgment statute, Section 768.79, Florida Statutes, “if a defendant serves an offer which is not accepted by a plaintiff, and if the judgment obtained by the plaintiff is at least 25 percent less than the amount of the offer, the defendant shall be awarded reasonable costs,…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS FOR CONVERSION AND CIVIL THEFT

Many business litigation cases assert claims for conversion and civil theft.  Under Florida law, and as explained by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal in Ice v. Cosmopolitan Residences on South Beach, a Condominium Association, Inc., 237 So.3d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), conversion “is the exercise of wrongful dominion and…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATION OF A CONTRACT

Under Florida law, breach of contract by anticipatory repudiation allows the non-breaching party to terminate his own contract and then sue for damages.  The Supreme Court of Florida in Hospital Mortgage Group v. First Prudential Development Corp., 411 So.2d 181 (Fla. 1982), explained in pertinent part that, “[i]n dealing with…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIMS AND THE “DIRECT BENEFIT” REQUIREMENT

Business litigation cases frequently assert claims of unjust enrichment that fail to satisfy the requirements of Florida law.  Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal in Gonzalez v. Eagle Insurance Co., 948 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), explained that, “[a]t the core of the law of restitution and unjust enrichment…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION

The Sherman Anti-Trust Act prohibits conspiracies unreasonably restraining trade. A group of competitors cannot enter agreements fixing prices or wages; rigging bids; or allocating customers, workers, or markets. 15 U.S.C. § 1. Consequently, exclusivity contracts and other restrictive covenants reducing competition may violate the Sherman Antitrust Act if they are…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: DEFENDING AGAINST CLAIMS ALLEGING DECEPTIVE OR UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES

Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, often called “FDUPTA,” prohibits certain deceptive and unfair trade practices.  In Bookworld Trade, Inc. v. Daughters of St. Paul, Inc., 532 F.Supp.2d 1350 (M.D. Fla. 2007), the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida explained that “[a] deceptive practice is…

Contact Us