A Florida business’ list of customers can be its most valuable asset. Often, disgruntled employees try to leave and start a new business with their former employer’s customer list. These disgruntled employees can often use customer information to undercut their former employer, without spending the money that the former employer…
Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog
FORT LAUDERALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PARTIAL WAIVER OF CONTRACTUAL RIGHT TO ARBITRATION
Florida businesses often prefer that their disputes be arbitrated and place arbitration provisions in their contracts. That right can easily be waived through conduct in litigation, however, such a waiver will likely be limited to the dispute at issue when the waiver occurred. Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale business…
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ARBITRATION AND APPEALS
Mavrick Law Firm has written extensively about conflicts concerning the right to have a dispute decided in arbitration. Parties will often believe that there is strategic advantage in pursuing or avoiding arbitration, and consequently, the arbitrability of a dispute is often litigated. This hotly contested issue can lead to an…
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: UNINENTIONAL WAIVER OF RIGHT TO ARBITRATION
Litigants wishing to preserve their right to arbitration in commercial disputes should have a strong understanding of that right and take actions to zealously preserve that right. The right to arbitration may be waived, and the question as to whether a party unintentionally waived arbitration arises often in litigation. Parties…
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-SOLICITATION COVENANTS
It is critical that Florida employers carefully write their non-compete agreements to ensure they are enforceable and prevent employees from performing the types of activities that the employer needs. Non-compete law in Florida is nuanced and slight deviations in contract wording can sometimes mean the difference between success or failure. …
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS OF FRAUD REQUIRE PROOF OF “REASONABLE RELIANCE”
“Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me,” is common sense. It also is a principle of law recently affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Parties that claim that they were defrauded by another generally cannot claim fraud a second time based…
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS DECIDED IN ARBITRATION VERSUS COURT PROCEEDINGS
Parties to a contract can agree to arbitrate certain disputes within a contract. As discussed in many of our previous articles, resolving a dispute through arbitration can affect the scope and amount of discovery, the speed of resolution, as well as the ultimate result of the case. Whether a particular…
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: DIVERGENT LEGAL STANDARDS FOR INJUNCTIONS IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS
The decision whether to bring a case in federal court or Florida state court can have significant consequences to the disposition of non-compete litigation. While both federal and Florida will usually apply the same substantive law, the procedure applied differs. This is particularly pertinent in non-compete litigation. Florida courts, when…
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: INTERPRETING CONTRACTS USING PAROL EVIDENCE
Commercial relationships are governed, in significant part, by contract law. When disputes arise between businesses, the interpretation of the terms of the parties’ agreement often will determine which side prevails. Litigants in contract disputes will often seek to gain advantage by bringing in testimony and evidence which supports their own…
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: IMPLIED CONTRACTS
An “implied contract” is a principle of law whereby courts will bind a party to an implied agreement when the elements of a contract are not otherwise met (an offer by one party over a matter which each party must provide some form of consideration which is accepted by another…