Close

Articles Posted in Business Litigation

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE

Sometimes litigants are asked to disclose trade secret information during the course of a lawsuit. These litigants usually object claiming the privilege of trade secret. See, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 90.506 (“A person has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent other persons from disclosing, a trade secret…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROVING INFRINGMENT OF AN UNREGISTERED TRADEMARK

A trade mark is any word, name, symbol, or device, that is used by a person to identify and distinguish his or her goods from a competitor’s goods. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1127. Registering a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office constitutes prima facie evidence that the trademark…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT

One cornerstone needed to enforce a valid restraint on trade is the requirement to be in writing and “signed by the person against whom enforcement is sought.” Fla. Stat. § 542.335. Courts use this requirement to reject enforcement of restrictive covenants that are not in writing or signed by the…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIMS

Tortious interference is a common business tort whereby the defendant unlawfully interferes with the plaintiff’s business relationship or contractual relationship. The elements of tortious interference are: (1) the existence of a business relationship [or contractual relationship] between the plaintiff and a third person, not necessarily evidenced by an enforceable contract,…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY TO CONTRACT

Standing is a legal concept requiring the litigant bringing the lawsuit to have a sufficient stake in the outcome of the controversy that enables the litigant to judicially resolve the controversy. Jamlynn Invs. Corp. v. San Marco Residences of Marco Condo. Ass’n, 544 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-COMPETE BURDENS

“Florida law … contains a comprehensive framework for analyzing, evaluating and enforcing restrictive covenants contained in employment contracts.”  Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Alfieri, 23 F. 4th 1282, 1291 (11th Cir. 2022) (quotation and citation omitted).  This framework includes a burden shifting approach between the restrictive covenant’s enforcer and enforcee that…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

In the absence of a non-compete agreement, Florida law prohibits tortious interference with certain business relationships.  The Supreme Court of Florida, in Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Cotton, 463 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 1985), explained that the elements of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship are “(1) the…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION:TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION VIA “SUBSTIANTIAL DERIVATION”

Under Florida law, a trade secret means information not commonly known by or available to the public, which derives economic value from not being generally known to or ascertainable by proper means by others who can obtain economic value from the information, and that was subject to reasonable efforts to…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: DIRECT AND INDIRECT TRADE SECRET MISAPPRORIATION

Federal courts distinguish between “direct” and “indirect” claims of trade secret misappropriation.  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. Cepia, L.L.C., 2012 WL 13572 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012), explained that the difference depends on whether a plaintiff alleges the defendant obtained the…

Contact Us