Close

Articles Posted in Employment Law

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ENFORCING FLORIDA’S TRADE SECRET ACT TO PREVENT EMPLOYEES FROM MISAPPROPRIATING EMPLOYER’S TRADE SECRETS

Trade secret misappropriation claims are commonly filed in business litigation by employers against former employees. An employee is precluded from using for his or her own advantage, and to the detriment of a former employer, any trade secrets obtained in the course of prior employment. East v. Aqua Gaming, Inc.,…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: SEEKING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO ENFORCE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

A prevalent issue in business litigation is whether an injunction is needed to enforce a restrictive covenant and protect a party’s legitimate business interest. In Florida, Section 542.335, Florida Statutes, governs the enforcement of restrictive covenants. Under section 542.335, “[a] trial court may grant a temporary injunction if the complainant…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROTECTING CUSTOMER LISTS AS TRADE SECRETS

A prevalent issue arising in business litigation throughout Florida is whether the customer list of a business or employer is a protected trade secret under Fl as a trade secret Florida’s Uniform Trade Secret Act (FUTSA). Trade secrets are broadly defined under FUTSA and include information that “derive[s] economic value…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION DURING EMPLOYMENT

In business litigation, claims for trade secret misappropriation often arise under Florida’s Uniform Trade Secret Act (“FUTSA”) or the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). For liability to attach under the DTSA and FUTSA, the information must be the fruit of wrongful acquisition, or misappropriation. The DTSA defines “misappropriation” to include…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ENFORCING RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS UNDER FLORIDA LAW

Business litigation often involves contractual disputes between employers and employees concerning the enforceability of non-compete agreements or other restrictive covenants. Under Florida law, a contractual non-compete restriction cannot be used solely as a tool to eliminate competition or merely to prevent an employee from working with a competing employer in…

Updated:

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: EMPLOYEE’S BURDEN TO DEMONSTRATE PRETEXT IN CLAIMS OF DISCRIMINATION

A prima facie case of discrimination raises the presumption or inference that the employer unlawfully discriminated against the employee. This is because the Court presumes the employer’s “acts, if otherwise unexplained, are more likely than not based on the consideration of impermissible factors.” Texas Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine,…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET THEFT BY AN EMPLOYEE

Business litigation in Florida often involves claims for trade secret misappropriation under Florida’s Uniform Trade Secret Act (FUTSA) or the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). For liability to attach under DTSA or FUTSA, the trade secret information must be the fruit of a wrongful acquisition or misappropriation. Misappropriation of a…

Updated:

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: DEFEATING TITLE VII RETALIATION CLAIMS

Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision makes it “an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any of [its] employees . . . because he has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter, or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any…

Updated:

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: AVOIDING VICARIOUS LIABILITY UNDER THE FARAGHER/ELLERTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination in the “terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.” 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a). The United States Supreme Court has also found cognizable similar claims for hostile work environment under Title VII. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993). In cases where…

Updated:

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: DEFEATING TITLE VII CLAIMS WHERE HARASSMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY SEVERE

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating “against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). Sexual harassment can constitute discrimination based on sex…

Contact Us