Close

Articles Posted in Trademark Infringement Litigation

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROVING INFRINGMENT OF AN UNREGISTERED TRADEMARK

A trade mark is any word, name, symbol, or device, that is used by a person to identify and distinguish his or her goods from a competitor’s goods. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1127. Registering a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office constitutes prima facie evidence that the trademark…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS OF FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER THE LANHAM ACT

Claims of false advertising are often asserted under the federal Lanham Act.  In Tobinick v. Novella, 848 F.3d 935 (11th Cir. 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit explained that “[t]he Lanham Act prescribes liability for false advertising to ‘commercial advertising or promotion.'”  To evaluate whether…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND CONSUMER CONFUSION

Federal law prohibits trademark infringement, which typically is enforced via the Lanham Act.  The Lanham Act, at 15 U.S.C. section 1127, defines a trademark as “any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof,” which is used by a person to “identify and distinguish his or her goods…from those…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: “REVERSE CONFUSION” TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

Under federal law, trademark infringement claims mainly governed by the Lanham Act.  The Lanham Act imposes civil liability on “[a]ny person who … uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: UNREGISTERED TRADEMARKS CANNOT BE GENERIC AND MUST BE DISTINCT

A prevalent issue in business litigation is whether a business’ unregistered name or mark qualifies for trademark protection. Under Florida’s common law, to “prevail on a common law trademark infringement claim, where the mark has not been registered, a plaintiff must show that it has trademark rights on the mark…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: DESCRIPTIVE TRADEMARKS REQUIRE A SECONDARY MEANING IF THEY ARE NOT INHERENTLY DISTINCT

Trademark infringement claims are common in business litigation. If a trademark application is still pending, or where a mark was never registered at all, then it is not presume that a given mark qualifies for trademark protection under Florida or federal law. Therefore, to establish a claim of trademark infringement,…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: REMEDIES FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE LANHAM ACT

The Lanham Act is a federal statute that protects businesses from various types of unfair competition, including trademark infringement. In business litigation, the Lanham Act permits trademark owners to sue other businesses or individuals for violating their trademark rights. The Lanham Act provides that “[w]hen a violation of any right of…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DETERMINING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION IN TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASES

The Lanham Act is a federal statute that protects businesses from various types of unfair competition, including trademark infringement. In business litigation, the Lanham Act permits trademark owners to sue other businesses or individuals for violating their trademark rights. To prevail on a claim of trademark infringement, a plaintiff must show:…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE LANHAM (TRADEMARK) ACT PROTECTS A COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE’S TRADE DRESS

The Lanham Act is a federal statute that protects businesses from various types of unfair competition, including trade dress infringement. The term “trade dress” is defined as “the total image of a product . . . [that] may include features such as size, shape, color or color combinations, textures, graphics,…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT AND UNAUTHORIZED “USE”

Under federal law, trademark infringement is proscribed by 15 U.S. C. § 1114(1)(a), which prohibits any person from the “use in commerce [of] any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services…

Contact Us