Articles Posted in Non-Compete Law

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: EMPLOYERS COULD BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY AN EMPLOYEE UNDER THAT EMPLOYEE’S NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT WITH HIS PRIOR EMPLOYER
Mavrick Law Firm

You may recall last week we discussed Florida’s Choice Act and the changes it may create to the non-compete landscape in Florida. The Choice Act establishes significantly more stringent non-compete restrictions on employees and independent contractors earning, or are reasonably expected to earn, a salary greater than twice the annual mean wage of the Florida…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE CHOICE ACT WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS FOR HIGH WAGE EARNERS
Mavrick Law Firm

            Florida law on noncompete agreements will likely change on July 1, 2025, under the “Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth Act” (CHOICE Act). The CHOICE Act will substantially enhance an employers’ ability to restrict certain employees from competing after their employment with the employer ends. The Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorneys of…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: FLORIDA MAY BE REPEALING ITS NON-COMPETE STATUTE
Mavrick Law Firm

Florida’s general rule prohibits contracts impeding commerce. Fla. Stat. § 542.18. (“Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.”). However, Florida’s legislature passed house bill 611 and 375 in the mid-1990’s to create an exception for restrictive covenants like non-compete agreements, non-solicitation agreements, and confidentiality agreements under…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: BUSINESSES CANNOT ENFORCE NON-COMPETES AFTER THEY STOP CONDUCTING BUSINESS
Mavrick Law Firm

Establishing the existence of a legitimate business interest is the foundation to enforcing a restrictive covenant like a non-competition agreement. Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (“The person seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant shall plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the restrictive covenant.”). The law imposes a burden to…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: JURY TRIAL WAIVERS ARE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm

It may be prudent to include a jury trial waiver in some business contracts. Contractual jury trial waivers are enforceable in Florida. Amquip Crane Rental, LLC v. Vercon Constr. Mgmt., Inc., 60 So. 3d 536 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (stating a party “may waive its right to a jury trial if the waiver was entered…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION COULD ITSELF VIOLATE A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm

A litigant seeking to obtain an injunction usually has to prove it was irreparably harmed to obtain an injunction. Hollywood Towers Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Hampton, 40 So. 3d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“To obtain a permanent injunction, the petitioner must establish a clear legal right, an inadequate remedy at law and that irreparable…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PREVAILING PARTY RECOVERY OF LEGAL EXPENSE
Mavrick Law Firm

We recently wrote articles on a litigant’s ability to recover prevailing party attorney’s fees under the American Rule. The Rule prohibits attorney’s fees unless they are authorized by statutes or by a contract provision. Q.H. v. Sunshine State Health Plan, Inc., 305 So. 3d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“Under the American rule, a court…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: SOLICITATION REQUIRES PROACTIVE ACT
Mavrick Law Firm

Restrictive covenants, such a non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, are important tools for businesses to protect their business interests. Restrictive covenants are enforceable if they are reasonable in time, geographic area, line of business, and supported by a “legitimate business interest.” Fla. Stat. § 542.335. Legitimate business interests can include protection of substantial relationships with specific…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PREVAILING PARTY ATTORNEY’S FEES ARE NOT GUARANTEED
Mavrick Law Firm

Recovering attorney’s fees is governed by the American Rule. This rule generally prohibits a party from recovering his or her attorney’s fees unless the fees are expressly permitted pursuant to a contract, statue, or rule. Q.H. v. Sunshine State Health Plan, Inc., 305 So. 3d 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“Under the American rule, a…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: IRREPARABLE INJURY IS PRESUMED WHEN A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS VIOLATED
Mavrick Law Firm

A plaintiff seeking permanent injunction must satisfy a four-factor test before a court can rule it is entitled to an injunction. A plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message