Articles Posted in Business Litigation

MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: WAIVING ARBITRATION
Mavrick Law Firm

Restrictive covenant agreements like non-compete agreements and non-solicitation agreements must be in writing. Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (“A court shall not enforce a restrictive covenant unless it is set forth in a writing signed by the person against whom enforcement is sought.”). This means restrictive covenant agreements containing non-compete provisions or non-solicitation provisions are often…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: WAIVING THE TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE
Mavrick Law Firm

Litigants should carefully consider the type of evidence they will need to establish their claims at trial because litigants can unwittingly waive their right to claim certain privileges that would otherwise protect the information from disclosure. Some privileges like the well-known attorney client privilege, protects litigants against disclosure of information shared with their counsel during…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-CONSUMER FDUTPA CLAIM
Mavrick Law Firm

The Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) prohibits unfair and deceptive trade practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce. It “is designed to protect consumers from deceptive acts that mislead consumers.” CareerFairs.com v. United Business Media LLC, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (S.D. Fla., Sept. 28, 2011). “A claim for damages…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: ALTERNATIVE TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION CLAIM
Mavrick Law Firm

Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, or FDUTPA for short, is a broad statute applying to many different transactions and scenarios. FDUTPA declares all unfair or deceptive acts or practices committed in the conduct of any trade or commerce unlawful. Fla. Stat. § 501.204. A trade practice is considered unfair under FDUTPA if it…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET LAWS APPLY OUTSIDE THE US
Mavrick Law Firm

Most trade secret disputes arise intrastate or interstate. However, trade secret lawsuits are not limited actions occurring within a particular state or the United States. A trade secret plaintiff can assert a misappropriation claim for acts occurring outside the United Stated under certain conditions pursuant to the federal trade secret act known as the Defend…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: CHOICE ACT EFFECTIVE DATE
Mavrick Law Firm

Florida’s Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth Act, or CHOICE Act for short, went into effect on July 1, 2025. The Choice Act is a significant piece of legislation because it substantially broadens an employer’s ability to restrict employees and independent contractor from competing against the employer. The Act, applies to employees and…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET INTERSTATE COMMERCE
Mavrick Law Firm

Trade secret statutes are generally similar. For example, Florida’s trade secret statute defines trade secrets as information deriving independent economic value from not being readily ascertainable by others through proper means and is the subject of reasonable efforts under the circumstances to maintain the information’s secrecy. Fla. Stat. § 688.002. California likewise defines trade secrets…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FIDUCIARY DUTY RELATIONSHIPS
Mavrick Law Firm

A fiduciary relationship exists “where confidence is reposed as a result of the position of superiority and influence held by the fiduciary” under Florida law. Argonaut Development Group, Inc. v. SWH Funding Corp., 150 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (S.D. Fla. 2001). The relationship is generally founded on trust. Capital Bank v. MVB, Inc., 644 So.…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: BLUE PENCILING IS NOT ALWAYS ALLOWED
Mavrick Law Firm

Florida statute § 542.335 allows one to enforce a contract “that restrict[s] or prohibit[s] competition during or after the term of restrictive covenants, so long as such [a] contract[ is] reasonable in time, area, and line of business.” Fla. Stat. § 542.335. The plain language of the statute suggests restrictive covenants cannot be enforced when…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FEDERAL SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Mavrick Law Firm

Maintaining a lawsuit in federal court is not always easy because the court must ensure it has subject matter jurisdiction over each claim at every stage of the litigation. A court can dismiss a lawsuit at any time if subject matter jurisdiction is not present. Even at the appellate stage after trial is concluded. Molinos…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message