Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA LAW ON NON-COMPETITION COVENANTS: REWRITING CONTRACTUAL TERMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida statutes on non-competition covenants allow courts to modify overbroad non-competition covenants. For example, a non-competition covenant restricting an employee from competing against the employer in every county in Florida is likely overbroad if the employer conducts business only in Broward County. Florida statutes, however, allow the court to modify such overbroad non-competition covenants and…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA LAW ON NON-COMPETITION COVENANTS: THE REQUIREMENT THAT COVENANTS BE READ IN FAVOR OF REASONABLE PROTECTION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida law requires that courts read non-competition covenants in favor of providing reasonable protection to a company’s legitimate business interest and prohibits courts from reading the non-competition covenant narrowly against the restraint. Anarkali Boutique, Inc. v. Ortiz, 104 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) provides an example of just how broadly Florida courts could…

Continue reading ›
DEPENDENT RELATIVE REVOCATION: THE DOCTRINE OF REVIVING REVOKED WILLS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

What happens when a person writes a new will, revokes his or her previous valid will, and the probate court later determines that the new will is invalid? Usually, the person will be considered to have died intestate, i.e., without a will, and his or her property will be distributed according to the Florida intestate…

Continue reading ›
UNLICENSED CONTRACTORS CANNOT ENFORCE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BUT COULD BE LIABLE UNDER THOSE CONTRACTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When two parties commit the same wrongdoing and are equally at fault, the court generally will not get involved in their transaction. That rule is known as the doctrine of “in pari delicto.” The doctrine of in pari delicto generally will apply to various forms of unlawful contracts. For example, if two parties enter into…

Continue reading ›
FRANCHISOR’S LIABILITY FOR FRANCHISEE ACTIONS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Franchise agreements can serve to establish a mutually beneficial relationship for the franchisor and the franchisee. Under a franchise agreement, the franchisor’s brand is allowed to grow through an independent business, i.e., the franchisee, and the franchisee is able to start a business without having to create a new product or brand. Because franchisees are…

Continue reading ›
SPENDTHRIFT TRUSTS AND DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS: PROTECTING TRUST ASSETS FROM CREDITORS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A spendthrift trust protects the trust assets against most creditors. To be valid under Florida law, a spendthrift trust must restrain both voluntary and involuntary transfers of the beneficiary’s interest. In other words, one cannot validly set up a trust to keep creditors out while simultaneously allowing the beneficiary to freely transfer his interest in…

Continue reading ›
PROPERLY DRAFTING A WILL: TRUE INTENT VS. INTENT STATED IN THE WILL
Mavrick Law Firm Team

In interpreting a will, Florida law holds that the intention of the testator is the controlling factor in the analysis. However, Florida law also provides that the testator’s intention should be gleaned from the four corners of the will. Aldrich v. Basile, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1027, at *12 (Fla. Mar. 27, 2014) (“The testator’s intention…

Continue reading ›
CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES: FLORIDA’S RECIPROCITY LAW AND THE AMERICAN RULE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The “American rule” holds that each party to a lawsuit will pay for his or her own attorney’s fees regardless of who prevails in the case. Unless a statute or contractual provision says otherwise, Florida courts will apply the American rule. For that reason, contracts oftentimes contain provisions stating that if litigation arises under the…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message