Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY CLIENT GOODWILL ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A temporary injunction is an available remedy when a party establishes that it has a valid, enforceable non-compete agreement that was violated. Fla. Stat. § 542.335(1)(j). Subsections 542.335(1)(b) and (c) of the Florida Statutes, set the standard for enforcing non-compete agreements and require the party seeking enforcement to plead and prove: (1) the existence of…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT: ISOLATED INCIDENTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT ARE RARELY VIABLE CLAIMS UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AND THE FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An aggrieved employee suing his or her employer for “sexual harassment” must present evidence that his workplace is such a hostile and abusive work environment because of his or her sex that it alters the conditions of his employment. An aggrieved employee does not make an actionable claim if he or she has suffered only…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS MAY BE ENFORCED UNLESS THEY CAN BE SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE OR UNJUST
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A forum-selection clause is a structural provision of a contract that addresses the procedural requirements for dispute resolution. In other words, the contracting parties may choose which forum, i.e. which federal or state court, for prospective disputes to be filed. Courts must enforce forum-selection agreements unless they are shown to be unreasonable or unjust. Peter…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: “LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION” MUST BE ESTABLISHED IN A COUNTERFEIT CLAIM WHERE MARKS ARE NOT “SUBSTANTIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under the Lanham Act, a defendant may be liable for trademark infringement, if, without consent, he/she uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark” which “is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1). The Act defines a “counterfeit” as a “spurious…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS REQUIRE PROOF OF PARTICULAR FACTS TO ESTABLISH A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST FOR A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Any competition by a former employee may injure the business of the former employer. However, the former employer cannot restrain ordinary competition. To be entitled to protection, the former employer must show special facts over and above ordinary competition which show that the former employee would have an unfair advantage without the non-compete agreement. Peter…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: COURTS SCRUTINIZE TRADE SECRET INFORMATION WHEN RULING ON PROTECTIVE ORDERS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information is critical when a business receives a subpoena for its business information and documents. Even when a business is not a party to a lawsuit, it can be compelled to produce sensitive information that can cause irreparable harm. It is often necessary to seek an order of protection…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LITIGATION: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT NON-COMPETE NEGOTIATIONS MAY BE SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When disputes arise over which version of a non-compete agreement was the final version executed by and binding on the parties, discovery of pre-contract negotiations may become necessary. Parties often retain an attorney for those negotiations. If the attorney involved in the negotiations becomes a witness to the case, attorney-client communications may need to be…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS DISMISSAL OF RACE DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE FAILED TO LOGICALLY PROVE DISCRIMINATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers in Florida are free to use all lawful criteria in deciding which employees to promote within the business. It is well known that Florida and federal law prohibit employment discrimination based on various characteristics, such as race, age, national origin, sex, or religious affiliation. When considering employment discrimination lawsuits, Florida and federal courts have…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-COMPETE PERIODS MAY NOT BE EXTENDED UNLESS THERE IS AN EQUITABLE REASON
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Non-compete provisions in employment contracts are not prohibited so long as such contracts are reasonable in time, area, and line of business. In any action concerning enforcement of a non-compete provision the court considers the terms of the contract as agreed to by the parties. If the non-compete period has expired, a court may not…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE TRADE SECRET INFORMATION WHEN CONSIDERING PROTECTIVE ORDERS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information is critical, when a business receives a subpoena for their business information and documents. Even when a business is not a party to a lawsuit, it can be compelled to produce sensitive information that can cause irreparable harm. It is often necessary to seek an order of protection…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message