Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: “LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS” NOT ARTICULATED UNDER THE NON-COMPETE STATUTE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Agreements in restraints of trade are generally void unless they comply with the procedures of § 542.335, Florida Statutes. The statute requires that any agreement restraining trade, such as a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement, be supported by a “legitimate business interest.” An agreement restraining trade can only be enforced to the extent that the agreement…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FORMING RELATIONSHIPS WITH CUSTOMERS AS PART OF A SALES POSITION MAY BE A PROTECTED BUSINESS INTEREST
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many sales positions, irrespective of the industry, require employees to establish personal relationships with prospective or existing customers. Sales employees often meet and greet a business’ existing and potential customers, at the business’ expense to ensure current and future business success. These substantial relationships formed by employees may constitute a protected legitimate business interests as…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-CONSUMER LAWSUITS UNDER FLORIDA’S DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”), § 501.201 et seq, Florida Statutes, allows a person to sue a business for unfair competition and deceptive or unconscionable business practices. Although the statute allows a consumer to sue a business for violations of FDUTPA, Florida appellate court decisions have also allowed some businesses to sue…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: THE MEANING OF THE TERM “INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC VALUE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida law can protect companies when their trade secrets are stolen. For such protections to apply, the confidential information at issue must qualify as a “trade secret” as defined by the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”). Fla. Stat. 688.001, et seq. Generally, something can be a trade secret if derives “independent economic value from…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: FLORIDA’S REVISED ARBITRATION CODE ALLOWS PARTIES TO SEEK PROVISIONAL REMEDIES EVEN WHEN THEY CONTRACTUALLY AGREED TO ARBITRATE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Arbitration Code provides businesses with flexibility in resolving their conflicts through arbitration. Arbitration is an immensely popular method of conflict resolution for Florida business litigation and employment litigation. Arbitration can generally help resolve disputes more quickly than litigation. However, parties to arbitration sometimes need court intervention via “provisional remedies,” i.e., a court ruling…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FLORIDA LEGISLATURE NARROWED THE APPLICATION OF NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS FOR CERTAIN SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Legislature has enacted a new statute impacting non-compete agreements for certain specialty physicians, effective June 25, 2019. Pursuant to Florida Statute § 542.336, there is no “legitimate business interest” to support non-compete agreements for physicians licensed under Chapter 458 and 459 of the Florida Statutes, where there is only one entity that employs…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LITIGATION: RECENT FEDERAL COURT PRECEDENT PERMITS TRADEMARK OWNERS TO SUE LANDLORDS FOR THEIR TENANTS’ VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A trademark owner can of course sue the business selling counterfeit copies of the trademark owner’s goods, but it may also sue other businesses that sufficiently provide products or services which the counterfeiter uses. In Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. Airport Mini Mall, LLC, 932 F.3d 1303 (2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: CHANGES IN FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT INTERPRETATIONS OF WHAT IS CONSIDERED SEX DISCRIMINATION UNDER FEDERAL LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Any employee claiming illegal sex discrimination must show that an employer took an adverse employment action, such as hiring, firing, promoting, or discipling an employee, and that action was motivated by the sex of the employee. Avoiding sex discrimination claims is complicated by the fact that the definition of “sex” as it is understood in…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETE LITIGATION: EMPLOYERS SHOULD CAREFULLY DRAFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS TO AVOID FURTHER LITIGATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers in litigation against their employees face the challenge of not only dealing with the claims made by those employees, but the threat of being left to pay the attorneys’ fees bill of their opponents. Employers can mitigate that risk, and sometimes even turn the tables and win their attorneys’ fees from their former employees,…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL ONLY PERMITS A NON-SIGNATORIES TO COMPEL ARBITRATION UNDER AN AGREEMENT IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Equitable estoppel is a legal doctrine that essentially prevents one party from taking unfair advantage of another party. Equitable estoppel allows a non-signatory to a contract to compel arbitration of a signatory’s claims against them, if the signatory raised allegations of concerted misconduct by both the non-signatory and one or more of the signatories to…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message