Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: THE LEGAL DOCTRINE OF JUDICIAL ESTOPPEL AS A DEFENSE AGAINST EMPLOYMENT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers may invoke the legal doctrine of judicial estoppel to prevent employees from suing their employers when those employees fail to disclose that claim in bankruptcy. In the recent case of Smith v. Haynes & Haynes P.C., 940 F.3d 635 (11th Cir. 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which governs…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: GUARANTORS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES BASED ON UNDERLYING DEBT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a guarantor is sued based on an absolute guarantee of a debt, the guarantor may either challenge the validity of the guarantee or show that the guaranteed debt is not owed. Under Florida law, the guarantor can be held liable only when a court determines the guaranty is lawful and the alleged debt is…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: WORKER’S COMPENSATION RETALIATION CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida law prohibits retaliation against an employee seeking worker compensation benefits. A recent Florida appellate decision allowed a worker compensation retaliation claim even though the employee never actually filed a worker compensation claim before termination of his employment. Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale employment attorney who defends businesses and business owners against claims of…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT LAW VERSUS NEW YORK LAW: PROTECTION OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS AND GOODWILL
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida and New York’s non-compete laws are protective of business interests in customer relationships and goodwill. Due to the mobility of workers as well as the frequent overbreadth of non-compete covenants in today’s economy, there are often cases when the non-compete laws of more than one state may be implicated In the context of employment…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE TO DEFEAT ALLEGED HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An employee bringing a hostile work environment claim must show that the complained of conduct is sufficiently severe to claim unlawful discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Florida Civil Rights Act. Generally, courts consider factors that include whether the incidents are frequent, severe, physically threatening or humiliating, and interfere with…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: FRANCHISORS MAY HAVE A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST IN RE-ENTERING MARKET SERVED BY TERMINATED FORMER FRANCHISEE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Franchisors will often include non-compete provisions in their Franchise Agreements to protect their ability to sell new franchises in a geographic region that was formerly served by a terminated franchisee. A party seeking to enforce a non-compete agreement must plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the non-compete covenant…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ORDINARY COMPETITION MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIM
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Tortious interference is the intentional and unjustified interference with a relationship or contract that results in damages. However, tortious interference does not occur every time a contract or business relationship is consequentially affected. Direct interference is a necessary element of the tort (a wrongful act or an infringement of a right). Peter Mavrick is a…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIMS DEPEND ON THE SEVERITY AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE HARASSMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

To qualify as sexual harassment under Florida and Federal antidiscrimination laws, sexual conduct between employees must be so severe and pervasive that it alters the “terms and conditions” of employment. While it may be prudent for an employer to discourage sexual relationships between supervisors and employees, the mere fact that an employee has been the…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: WITHOUT A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT, AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING USE OF TRADE SECRETS MAY NOT ENJOIN COMPETITION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”) requires courts to take reasonable steps to preserve the secrecy of trade secrets. Fla. Stat. § 688.006. Injunctive relief may be ordered to preserve trade secrets based on actual or threatened misappropriation, as well as, compelling parties to perform specific acts. Fla. Stat. § 688.003. FUTSA, however, may…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ARBITRATION PROVISIONS AND THEIR SCOPE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under Florida and federal law, whether a legal dispute is subject to the requirement that the parties submit to arbitration (what courts refer to as the “arbitrability” of the dispute) depends on what the wording of the arbitration agreement itself states. The parties’ intent as to what issues are to be arbitrated is typically evident…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message