Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution which can provide a speedy and less costly resolution to disputes. Arbitration is often preferred by the party who is a defendant on the belief that arbitration is better strategically. The speedier resolution of arbitration does not come without a cost. A party to an arbitration aggrieved by…
Continue reading ›Pursuant to Section 542.335, Florida Statutes, a non-compete agreement must be in a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Businesses often enter agreements with their employees for specified period with an option to renew. Courts have found that written agreements can be extended beyond their expiration dates when the parties agree…
Continue reading ›Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution which parties may agree to through a pre-dispute contract. Often, a plaintiff will attempt to avoid the contractual agreement to arbitration because the plaintiff believes that arbitration puts him or her at a strategic disadvantage. A plaintiff may argue that he or she did not have the capacity…
Continue reading ›When a party to a non-compete agreement no longer provides services in that particular “line of business,” they may no longer have a legitimate business interest preventing the other party from competing. However, discontinuance from servicing a specific demographic of customers does not necessary constitute the fact that a party may no longer offer services…
Continue reading ›Sometimes, an employment relationship can become acrimonious. A disgruntled employee is more likely to complain and more likely to fail to perform work. As a result, some terminated employees try to assert that the loss of their employment was not their performance or attitude but instead because of unlawful retaliation. In lawsuits accusing the employer…
Continue reading ›Arbitration can provide Florida businesses with a swift and less costly resolution to a dispute in comparison to litigation. Arbitration generally benefits the party accused of wrongdoing more than the plaintiff. Accordingly, a plaintiff will usually have the incentive to try to find a way to avoid the application of an arbitration clause while a…
Continue reading ›Florida law concerning a claim of civil theft is a double-edged sword. A company that prevails on a business litigation claim of civil theft can be awarded treble damages and attorneys’ fees. However, a company claiming civil theft risks having to pay the opposing side’s attorney’s fees for failure to prove the required element of…
Continue reading ›The Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA) requires that an employee-plaintiff comply with an administrative procedure with the Florida Commission of Human Relations (FCHR) prior to filing suit. The purpose of this requirement is to reduce the number of discrimination lawsuits by filtering clearly meritless claims and attempting to resolve disputes before a civil lawsuit may…
Continue reading ›When a business is purchased, often the former owner will enter into a separate employment agreement to provide continuity of service to the customers and a smooth transition from the former owner to the new one. Such agreements typically include a non-compete provision so that the former owner does not attempt to take the customers…
Continue reading ›Parties to a contract with an arbitration agreement will often litigate the issue of whether the arbitration provision covers the parties’ dispute. Because arbitration is a different method of dispute resolution than court litigation, the distinguishing traits of arbitration can tactically benefit one party more than the other. Parties will often have the incentive to…
Continue reading ›
