Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A company that successfully has its mark registered with the USPTO does not have immunity from other trademark owners claiming infringement. A trademark owner with a higher priority may nevertheless sue under the Lanham act if it can show that there is a “likelihood of confusion” between the two marks. Peter Mavrick is a Miami…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE ACT (“CARES ACT”) REQUIREMENTS FOR BUSINESSES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (CARES Act) requires that employers permit their employees to have paid leave in certain circumstances related to the COVID-19 pandemic. While the FFCRA is mandatory for qualifying businesses, the burden of this law is offset because employers receive a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for the wages paid pursuant to the…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUD CLAIMS AND DEFENSE OF “PUFFERY”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Disgruntled purchases of goods or services may later claim fraud by asserting that they relied on untrue statements made by the selling company when deciding to make the purchase. However, a purchaser generally may not rely on a statement that qualifies as “puffery.” A statement is puffery if it is merely a statement of opinion…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DISPUTE MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses often execute non-compete agreements separate from but contemporaneously with an employment agreement. When the employment agreement contains an arbitration provision, but the non-compete agreement does not, parties can dispute whether the non-compete agreement is arbitrable. Further, it becomes more complicated if the non-compete agreement contains wording that suggests that disputes must be litigated in…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: DEFEATING RETALIATION CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The “opposition clause” of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prevents covered employers from retaliating against employees because they oppose a practice which is unlawful under the Act. Accordingly, an employer can be liable for terminating an employee for complaining about allegedly discriminatory conduct. A recent en banc case with the United…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN INSULATE DIRECTORS FROM LIABILITY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The business judgment rule can shield directors of corporations, members of limited liability companies, and associations from liability against claims of negligent management. The business judgment rule is designed to prevent courts from “Monday morning quarterbacking” the decisions made by those in control of organizations merely because the plaintiff does not like the outcome of…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under Florida law, every contract has a duty of good faith and fair dealing. A party to a contract generally cannot subvert the very purpose of a contract through an improper exercise of its discretion. A party does not violate the duty of good faith and fair dealing, however, when the parties expressly contemplated the…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: FLORIDA LAW VERSUS MARYLAND LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida and Maryland’s non-compete laws are protective of business interests in customer relationships and goodwill. Due to the advent of remote working capabilities, there are often cases when the non-compete laws of more than one state may be implicated. For example, a Florida employee may work in Florida for a company based in Maryland, and…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: EEOC LEGAL DEADLINES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employee-plaintiffs face strict deadlines when bringing discrimination claims. The 90-day deadline to file a lawsuit filing receipt of a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC can sometimes be extended if the receipt of the letter was delayed. A recent case before the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals explained that these time extensions will not…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR DISTINCT TRADE NAME
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida businesses seeking to protect their reputation may need to bring a lawsuit under the Lanham Act to protect their trademarks. Defendants in business litigation asserting trademark infringement sometimes defend on the grounds that the plaintiff’s trademark is “generic” and therefore cannot be protected under the Lanham Act. A recent case from the United States…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message