FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: ACCOUNT STATED AND OPEN ACCOUNT

Mavrick Law Firm

Business litigants owed money by another usually sue for breach of contract. However, there are other common law claims that can be asserted along with, or instead of, breach of contract to recover a debt owed by another. One potential claim is called an account stated and other potential claim is called open account. The two claims are similar but have important difference. We explain the claims and their differences below. The Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorneys of the Mavrick Law Firm represent businesses and their owners in breach of contract litigation and related claims of fraud, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration.

An action for account stated is an action for a sum certain. Monte Produce, Inc. v. Delgado, 126 Ariz. 320, 614 P. 2d 862 (1980). Therefore, an account stated exists when there is an agreement between the parties that a certain balance is correct and due and an express or implicit promise to pay that balance. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co. v. Corniche Exp., 400 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA  1981). The agreement can be implicit. Breezy Bay, Inc. v. Industria Maquiladora Mexicana, S.A., 361 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (implicitly admitted to correctness of invoices). Therefore, a prima facie case for the correctness of the account and the liability of the debtor is made implicitly when an account statement is “rendered to[,] and received by[,] one who made no objection thereto within a reasonable time,” Daytona Bridge Co. v. Bond, 36 So. 445 (Fla. 1904).  

The existence of an objection to an invoice by itself does not automatically nullify the ability to assert an account stated claim because the objection must pertain to the amount due as stated on the invoice. Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Antigo Indus., Inc., 297 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Objection regarding other issues do not preclude an account stated claim. In Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Antigo Indus., Inc., the defendant objected to the invoice giving rise to the account stated claim because the defendant was owed a set-off credit for past services. The court determined this objection did not preclude the account stated claim because the objection was not directed to the amount of the invoice. Consequently, an implicit agreement as to the amount was formed.

An open account is harder to define than account stated. H & H Design Builders, Inc. v. Travelers’ Indem. Co., 639 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (“It is not as easy as it should be to identify what does—or does not—constitute a cause of action for “open account.’”). It is generally defined as an unsettled debt, arising from items of work or labor, goods sold and other open transactions not reduced to writing, the sole record of which is usually the account books of the owner of the demand. S. Motor Co. of Dade County v. Accountable Constr. Co., 707 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). To “state a valid claim on an open account, the claimant must attach an ‘itemized’ copy of the account [to the complaint].” H & H Design Builders, Inc. v. Travelers’ Indem. Co., 639 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). A lump-sum invoice will not satisfy the itemized account requirement. H & H Design Builders, Inc., 639 So. 2d 697 (“The statement of account attached to the complaint involved in this case stated only the lump-sum balance due claimed for each policy period, not the items on which the claim was based.”).

The Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorneys of the Mavrick Law Firm represent businesses and their owners in breach of contract litigation and related claims of fraud, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration.

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message