Articles Posted in Business Litigation

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: DEFAMATION OPINIONS
Mavrick Law Firm

Defamation is a tort that is sometimes asserted in commercial disputes. Litigants asserting defamation must prove “the defendant published a false statement[ ] about the plaintiff[ ] to a third party[ ]  and [that false] statement caused injury to [the plaintiff]” to be successful. Alan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 604 Fed. App’x 863 (11th…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: CHOICE OF LAW
Mavrick Law Firm

The outcome of a lawsuit can be determined by the applicable law. Parties to a contract can choose which state’s laws apply to the execution of the contract by using a choice of law provision. Many contracts contain choice of law provisions, but few contracting parties think critically about the ramifications for selecting the application…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: FRANCHISORS, LICENSORS, AND BUSINESS PURCHASERS
Mavrick Law Firm

Restrictive covenant non-compete agreements are typically associated with an employer/employee relationship. An employer usually requires its employees to execute restrictive covenant agreements to protect its trade secrets, customers, vendors, and goodwill. However, the employer/employee relationship is not the only context a restrictive covenant can be used. Non-compete agreements and similar restrictive covenant agreements can also…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET LITIGATION PROTECTIONS
Mavrick Law Firm

Trade secret owners often face a dilemma when debating whether to prosecute a lawsuit against another for trade secret misappropriation. The trade secret owner can bring the lawsuit and risk exposing the trade secret even more in the court proceeding. Conversely, the trade secret owner can refrain from bringing the lawsuit to prevent exposure in…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION IMMUNITY
Mavrick Law Firm

The federal trade secret statute offers trade secret owners broad protections protecting their trade secrets. A trade secret owner may prosecute a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit against another who intends to convert a trade secret forthe economic benefit of anyone other than the owner. The statute covers those that (1) steal or attempt to steal…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: COMPETITION PRIVILEGE
Mavrick Law Firm

Tortious interference is a common business tort. The tort is comprised of four elements. A litigant must prove the existence of a business relationship or contractual relationship under which the plaintiff has legal rights; the defendant’s knowledge of the business relationship or contractual relationship; (3) an act of the defendant amounting to an intentional and…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: EMPLOYER PREVAILS ON DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm

Disgruntled employees will sometimes sue their employer under various discrimination and retaliation claims. The recent case of Wilcox v. TMCFM, Inc., 2025 WL 2097299 (M.D. Fla., July 25, 2025) is a good example of a court adjudicating the claims in favor of the employer because the claims were unmeritorious. The Miami business litigation attorneys of…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: REVERSE ENGINEERING A TRADE SECRET
Mavrick Law Firm

Trade secret laws can offer broad protections for products during the conceptualization, design, test, and improvement phases when patentability is often uncertain. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989) (stating that “protections of state trade secret law are most effective at the developmental stage, before a product has been marketed…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ESSENTIAL ARBITRATION TERMS
Mavrick Law Firm

Arbitration provisions are often heavily litigated because the issue can have significant impact on the case. Determining whether parties must arbitrate can impact a litigant’s right to a jury trial, access to the court system, and the cost of litigation. Whether a litigant is trying to compel arbitration or avoid arbitration, litigants should carefully review…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FDUTPA ATTORNEY’S FEES
Mavrick Law Firm

The Florida Legislature declared deceptive and unfair methods of competition and practices in trade and commerce to be unlawful under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, or FDUTPA for short. Fla. Stat. § 501.202. FDUTPA is a powerful statute because deceptive and unfair trade practices broadly encompass many actions that occur in a…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message