Articles Posted in Business Litigation

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: CONTRACTS THAT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS BE IN WRITING
Mavrick Law Firm

As the United States Supreme Court explained in Nw Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Riggs, 203 U.S. 243 (1906), the freedom of contract is a constitutionally protected right. Contracting parties are free to address any issue they choose, including the question of whether their agreement may be modified at all and, if so, how. When…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DEFAMATION AND LITIGATION PRIVILEGE IMMUNITY
Mavrick Law Firm

For a long time, Florida courts have employed the “litigation privilege” to provide “all persons involved in judicial proceedings, including parties and counsel, and absolute privilege from civil liability for acts taken in relation to those proceedings.” North Star Cap. Acquisitions, LLC v. Krig, 611 F.Supp.2d 1324 (M.D. Fla. 2009). Precedent from the Supreme Court…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE AND IDENTIFIABLE CUSTOMERS
Mavrick Law Firm

Tortious interference claims are frequently pled in business litigation against competitors, and generally assert a type of “unfair competition” that interferes with a business relationship. Under Florida law, the elements of tortious interference with a business relationship are: (1) the existence of a business relationship that affords the plaintiff existing or prospective legal rights; (2)…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: RECOVERY OF PREJUDGEMENT INTEREST IN FINAL JUDGMENT
Mavrick Law Firm

Precedent from the Supreme Court of Florida in Argonaut Insurance Company v. May Plumbing Company, 474 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1985), set forth the legal standard for recovery prejudgment interest where there is recovery of financial loss at trial. Argonaut held that “when a verdict liquidates damages on a plaintiff’s out-of-pocket, pecuniary losses, plaintiff is entitled,…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS BASED ON CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Mavrick Law Firm

Under Florida law, restrictive covenants are generally unenforceable under Florida law as restraints on trade. Section 541.18, Florida Statutes, states that “[e]very contract, combination or conspiracy in restrain of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.” Precedent from the Supreme Court of Florida in White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting Servs. of Se. Fla, LLC,…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET CLAIMS BASED ON PUBLIC INFORMATION
Mavrick Law Firm

Under Florida law, trade secrets may be enforced via a statutory cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Florida Statute Section 688.002(4) defines the term “trade secret” as: “[I]nformation, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to,…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: CLAIMS ALLEGING INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
Mavrick Law Firm

Some Florida employers and their owners or managers have been sued for alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Supreme Court of Florida in Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. McCarson, 467 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1985), held that to prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff must prove (1) the defendant engaged in intentional or…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: WHISTLEBLOWER ACT CLAIM AND CONSTRUCTIVE DISCHARGE
Mavrick Law Firm

Florida’s Whistleblower’s Act, governing private sector employers, prohibits the employer from taking “retaliatory personnel action” against an employee because the employee “[o]bjected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation.” Section 448.102(3), Florida Statutes. The statute defines “retaliatory personnel…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS OF FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER THE LANHAM ACT
Mavrick Law Firm

Claims of false advertising are often asserted under the federal Lanham Act. In Tobinick v. Novella, 848 F.3d 935 (11th Cir. 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit explained that “[t]he Lanham Act prescribes liability for false advertising to ‘commercial advertising or promotion.’” To evaluate whether a claim can be asserted…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm

In Florida, an injunction is the generally favored remedy in cases of breach of a non-compete agreement. The Supreme Court of Florida in Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1974), explained that in cases of breach of a restrictive covenant, “[t]he Court may award damages for breach of contract but the normal…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message