Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: EMPLOYERS COULD BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY AN EMPLOYEE UNDER THAT EMPLOYEE’S NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT WITH HIS PRIOR EMPLOYER
Mavrick Law Firm

You may recall last week we discussed Florida’s Choice Act and the changes it may create to the non-compete landscape in Florida. The Choice Act establishes significantly more stringent non-compete restrictions on employees and independent contractors earning, or are reasonably expected to earn, a salary greater than twice the annual mean wage of the Florida…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD ALWAYS OBTAIN A WRITTEN AGREEMENT STATING THEIR OWNERSHIP SHARE IN THE COMPANY TO AVOID DISPUTE
Mavrick Law Firm

A common business dispute involves two business partners who disagree about the ownership split of the business. This dispute often arises from poor documentation, which can lead to protracted and expensive litigation. Ownership rights often turn on simple contract principles like offer, acceptance, and consideration. Jacob v. Bernatek, 764 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: REVERSE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS AND DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS NOW HAVE THE SAME LEGAL STANDARD
Mavrick Law Firm

In the employment context, “reverse discrimination” occurs when an employer discriminates against a member of a majority group, instead of a minority. While claims of unlawful reverse discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are rare, they do occasionally occur. Some federal circuits treated reverse discrimination claims under Title VII differently…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE CHOICE ACT WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS FOR HIGH WAGE EARNERS
Mavrick Law Firm

            Florida law on noncompete agreements will likely change on July 1, 2025, under the “Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth Act” (CHOICE Act). The CHOICE Act will substantially enhance an employers’ ability to restrict certain employees from competing after their employment with the employer ends. The Fort Lauderdale business litigation attorneys of…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ESTABLISHING A TRADE SECRET’S INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC VALUE CAN BE TRICKY
Mavrick Law Firm

American law recognizes that the protection of trade secrets results in substantial benefits to businesses and society. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470 (1974). Protecting commercial entities trade secret theft encourages investment in processes and technologies benefiting consumers. Therefore, trade secret laws promote “the efficient operation of industry” by affording those who…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PARTIES THAT AGREE TO SATISFY PRIOR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS CANNOT ENFORCE THOSE OBLIGATIONS LATER IN A LAWSUIT
Mavrick Law Firm

            Florida law recognizes the defense of accord and satisfaction in contract disputes. The defense applies when contracting parties agree to resolve their dispute by accepting performance of an obligation that differs from the original obligation required under the contract. Jacksonville Elec. Authority v. Draper’s Egg & Poultry Co., 557 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. 1990)…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: FLORIDA MAY BE REPEALING ITS NON-COMPETE STATUTE
Mavrick Law Firm

Florida’s general rule prohibits contracts impeding commerce. Fla. Stat. § 542.18. (“Every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce in this state is unlawful.”). However, Florida’s legislature passed house bill 611 and 375 in the mid-1990’s to create an exception for restrictive covenants like non-compete agreements, non-solicitation agreements, and confidentiality agreements under…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PRINCIPALS CAN BIND THEMSELVES TO CONTRACTS OR TRANSACTIONS AFTER-THE-FACT BY RATIFICATION
Mavrick Law Firm

The acts of an agent are imputed to the agent’s principal so long as the agent acted within the scope of his or her authority. The scope of that authority is often derived from actual or apparent authority provided by the principal. Taco Bell of Cal. v. Zappone, 324 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d CA…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: INEVITABLE TRADE SECRET DISCLOSURE DOES NOT PROVIDE A BASIS FOR INJUNCTION IN FLORIDA
Mavrick Law Firm

Most trade secret statutes provide the owner of a trade secret with an injunction remedy prohibiting another from disclosing the owner’s trade secret. Florida’s trade secret statute expressly provides that an injunction is permissible when disclosure is actual or threatened. Fla. Stat. § 688.003. (“Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined.”). However, some courts have…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: PRIOR PROMOTIONS CAN PREVENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm

When an employer selects an employee for promotion, the employer usually has several potential employees to select for the promotion. The employer decides who is most deserving of the promotion based on legitimate factors relating to the position like skill, aptitude, and job performance. But less deserving employees may dislike the employer’s decision and file…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message